Revelation 14 - Verse by Verse Bible Study
By Pastor Steven L Anderson
Watch Video
January, 2013
Now in Revelation chapter 14, verse number
, the Bible reads "And I looked... written
in their foreheads." Now, we should expect
to see the , here, because as I explained
in other sermons, the book of Revelation goes
in chronological order from chapters through
, then the chronology starts over in chapter
with the birth of Christ. And then we see
the whole story play out all over again. Well
in the first half of the book of Revelation,
we saw the story play out as the tribulation,
then after the tribulation the sun and moon
are darkened, then there was mention of the
, being sealed, then we had the rapture
where the great multitude appears in heaven
in chapter , and then we have God pour out
his wrath. Well in the second half of Revelation,
we see the same sequence of events. We see
the events of the tribulation, and that's
where we were in chapter , at the time of
the abomination of desolation. Great tribulation
and persecution and people being killed for
the cause of Christ. Therefore we should expect
the next thing to be mentioned as the ,,
because it goes in the first half- tribulation,
, rapture, and then God pouring out
his wrath. Same exact order in the second
half. And so here, right on time, we've got
the , once again. It said "I looked
and lo a... written in their foreheads." Now
let's compare this with chapter . Keep your
finger in chapter as we go back to chapter
. Let's go back and forth between these two
chapters, because when it talks about the
Father's name being written in their foreheads,
that's actually mentioned in chapter what
that is. It says in verse of chapter ,
"And after these things, I saw... in their
foreheads." So the Father's name written in
their foreheads written in their foreheads
in Revelation , is here known as being "sealed"
in their foreheads, in chapter . It says
"I heard the number of them which were sealed,
and there were sealed an hundred and forty
and four thousand of all the tribes of the
children of Israel." And then He gets very
specific and mentions that there are twelve
thousand from each tribe, and he list those
tribes. From the tribe of Juda were sealed
twelve thousand, Reuben, Gad, Asher, on and
on. Everything except the tribe of Dan, which
is not mentioned. Now, let me point out a
couple of things quickly about Revelation
here. First of all, isn't it clear from
verses and that God has not begun to pour
out his wrath on this earth yet at this time?
Because he says that they're not going to
hurt the earth, they're not going to hurt
the trees. Well look, when God starts to pour
out his wrath with the trumpets and vials,
he is definately hurting the trees. The first
trumpet, He says that one third of the trees
are burnt up. So this is CLEARLY, this sealing
is clearly taking place BEFORE that time.
So, it's after the tribulation when the sun
and moon are darkened. But it's BEFORE God
pours out his wrath, before He pours out the
wrath, He is going to seal the ,. That's
what we see here in chapter . After the listing
of all the different tribes, it says in verse
, "After this I beheld, and, lo, a great
multitude which no man could number, of all
nations". So this great multitude appears
in heaven right after the , are sealed.
He says "this group came out of great tribulation,
they've washed their robes, they've made them
white in the blood of the lamb." And I'm not
going to re-preach my sermon from Revelation
, I already covered that in Revelation .
But we see from chapter , that these people
are sealed in their foreheads, AFTER the sun
and moon are darkened with the opening of
the sixth seal, which JESUS in Matthew
said is AFTER the tribulation, but it's before
God begins to pour out His wrath and destroy
the earth. Go back if you would to Revelation
. And in Revelation , it says "And I heard
a voice from heaven, as the voice of many
waters". So where is the voice coming from?
From heaven. That's significant. It says "and
as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard
the voice of harpers harping with their harps:
And they sung"- so the harpers are singing.
And it says "And THEY sung as it were a new
song before the throne, and before the four
beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn
that song but the hundred and forty and four
thousand, which were redeemed from the earth."
So what we see here with the , is that
they are singing a song that no-one else can
learn, and that when they sing that song they
also play harps. And when they sing that song,
the Bible says that it's coming from heaven,
because the voice of the song, it says he
heard it coming from heaven. Where are the
,? Well, it says they stood on the mount
Zion with the Lamb. Of course the Lamb is
Jesus CHrist. Well, if we go to Hebrews :-
"But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto
the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem,
and to an innumerable company of angels, To
the general assembly and church of the firstborn,
which are written in heaven". So what we see
is that the Bible is telling us very clearly
that the , are located not on the earth,
but in heaven. The , are in heaven playing
on harps and singing a song that only they
can sing. Now, he says that the sound of the
singing sounds like the voice of many waters.
Well look, if you are listening to ,
MEN sing, that's going to be pretty loud,
that's going to be like the voice of many
waters. It's going to sound like a great thunder
when that many people are singing. It says
they are on mount Zion. Hebrews tells us
that the "mount Zion" is talking about the
heavenly Jerusalem. The voice of their singing
is coming from heaven and they're with the
Lamb, who of course is in heaven. So it's
very obvious that they're in heaven. You say
"what's the significance of the fact that
the , are in heaven at this time?" Here's
the significance. Remember in Revelation ,
the , were SEALED BEFORE the RAPTURE,
or before the great multitude appears in heaven.
Because when the multitude appears in heaven,
he very carefully tells us... "AFTER this,
I saw a great multitude", and it's clear that
they just got there. And again, I'm not going
to re-preach my Revelation sermon. But,
if Revelation is giving us the same events
of chapter in the same order, then we would
expect the rapture to be signified right after
the mention of the ,. Because if the
first half gace us tribulation, , rapture,
then God pours out the wrath... The second
half of the book of Revelation is going to
follow the same order. Well look, later on
we do see the rapture. Look down if you would
at verse number of chapter . It says
"And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and
upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of
man". Well look, the Son of man is something
that Jesus called himself I believe times.
So it says that the one that is on the cloud
is like the Son of man, "having on his head
a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.
And another angel came our of the temple,
crying with a loud voice to him that sat on
the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle and reap:
for the the time is come for thee to reap;
for the harvest of the earth is ripe. And
he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle
on the earth, and the earth was reaped." So
look, we see in chapter , verses through
, Jesus Christ coming in the clouds, and
reaping the earth. Now some people will try
to say "well, this reaping is a reaping of
the tares, of the bad, the children of the
wicked one, of BAD people to face God's wrath."
Nope. Because right after Jesus reaps in the
clouds, right after that it says in verse
"And another angel came out of the temple
which is in heaven, he also having a sharp
sickle. And another angel came out from the
altar from the altar, which had power over
fire; and cried with a loud cry to him that
had the sharp sickle, saying, Thust in thy
sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the
vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully
ripe. And the angel thrust in his sickle into
the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth,
and cast it into the great winepress of the
wrath of God. And the winepress was trodden
without the city, and blood came out of the
winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by
the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs."
So what we see is two reapings, don't we?
First we see Jesus Christ reaping the earth,
coming in a cloud, then AFTER that we see
another angelwho gathers the clusters of the
vine of the earth, and casts them into the
winepress of the wrath of God. That's the
negative reaping. Now you say "wait a minute
Pastor Anderson, I remember a parable in Matthew
chapter that talked about the tares being
gathered and also the wheat being harbested.
And you know the "wheat" were the children
of the kingdom of God, and the "tares" were
the children of the wicked one. And the Bible
says "therefore as the tares are gathered
and burned in the fire, so shall it be in
the end of the world." And if you remember,
in that scripture it said "gather ye together
FIRST the tares, and bind them in bundles
to burn them, but gather the wheat into my
barn."" And you say "Pastor Anderson, this
appears to be in the opposite order, because
in Matthew chapter it said "gather together
FIRST the tares, and bind them in bundles
to burn them, but gather the wheat into my
barn." Seems like a different order." But
wait a minute, he didn't say that the tares
were going to be BURNED before the wheat is
gathered into the barn. He just said "GATHER
TOGETHER first the tares, and bind them in
bundles to burn them." Here we see that the
unsaved are pictured as CLUSTERS of grapes.
Now can you see a similarity between a cluster
and a bundle? They're both a group, they're
both something of a smaller unti that's joined
together. And here is the thing, what we see
happen BEFORE the wheat is gathered into the
barn, before the children of the kingdom of
God, the saved, the elect, BEFORE they're
gathered and taken to heaven, we see the wicked
bound into bundles, or clustering together,
we see them uniting. Remember Psalm ? "The
kings of the earth are gathered together against
the Lord and against his annointed". And what
we see is that the unbelievers and the unsaved
UNITE, the religions UNITE, the governments
unite, the unsaved world UNTIES and rallies
around the antichrist, and they even receive
the mark of the antichrist, the mark of the
beast in their forehead or in their hand.
They're being marked and identified for judgement.
They're being gathered and bound into bundles
to be burnt, to be destroyed. Then the wheat
is gathered into the barn, THEN the clusters
or bundles are cast into the fire or the winepress
of the wrath of God, whichever metaphor you
are looking at. So what we are seeing here,
is that Jesus Christ comes in the cloud, to
reap the wheat, or to reap the saved, to gather
the elect. Look, why else is Jesus coming
in a cloud in Revelation ? When he comes
in a cloud, it's to sound the trumpet and
to gather the elect. He is reaping the earth.
He is harvesting in the good crop of the saved
in Revelation . But here is what's interesting.
If Revelation , verses through is
referring to the rapture, which I believe
it clearly is, it's following the same exact
chronology as Matthew and as Revelation
, if that's referring to the rapture... Think
about this. How did the , end up in
heaven BEFORE the rapture? Did you notice
that? Becasue at the beginning of chapter
, the , are already in heaven, and
they already have the seal in their foreheads
BEFORE the rapture. Now that's consistent
with Revelation , because the , are
sealed right before the rapture in Revelation
. Here it's the same order. Here is a question
though. How do you get to heaven without being
raptured? Dying, right? How do you get to
heaven without being raptured? Look, when
I die, I'm going to heaven, right? When you
die, if you are saved, you are going to heaven,
right? How long do we wait to get there? It's
instant. The moment that you die, to be absent
from the body is to be present with the Lord.
And the moment I breathe my last breath physically,
I am going straight to heaven. So look, if
the , are in heaven BEFORE the rapture,
BEFORE Christ has come in the cloiuds, before
the dead in Christ are raised to meet Christ
in the clouds, before it's even said "hey
the time has come". Look, the fact that they
are already there proves that the ,
have already DIED. That's how they got to
heaven. They've died physically. Now, here
is the proof that they've died physically-
because the Bible clearly told us in Revelation
, that the , were of the tribes
of Israel, right? Now, alot of people will
misquote this, and this is what they'll say.
"Oh, the , JEWS". Have you heard people
say ", Jews". Now, did the Bible say
, Jews? No. It said , of the
tribes of Israel. And it clearly stated which
tribes they were from, and twelve thousand
from each tribe. You say wait a minute Pastor
Anderson, they Jews are the tribes of Israel.
Wrong. Go to nd Kings chapter . Because
you see the term "Jew", God never used it
in the Bible to refer to all tribes. NEVER.
In fact, the word "Jew" is never used in the
Bible until nd Kings . nd Kings is
the first time that the word "Jew" is ever
used in the Bible. Now let me explain something
to you. When you're studying the Bible and
you've got a word, and you want to know what
that word means, usually if you go back to
the first time that word is mentioned, God
will define it for you, to make it easy to
understand. Look at Genesis chapter , how
God is defining everything. He defines day,
He defines night, He defines seas, He defines
earth, He defines all these things. If you
look up words the first time they are used,
look up the first time "tongues" is used,
look up the first time "reprobate" is used.
Look up the first time most words are used,
look up the first time "hell" is used, it
talks about fire. God usually defines things,
the first time they are mentioned. If we go
to the first mention of the word "Jew" in
the Bible, it becomes very clear that the
term "Jew" is NOT synonymous with the twelve
tribes of the children of Israel as people
have tried to say. "Oh, these , are
the Jews in the last days believing on Christ."
Look at nd Kings :. Read this very carefully.
It says "Then Rezin king of Syria and Pkah
son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to
Jerusalem to war". So who is fighting against
Jerusalem? Syria and Israel. And it says that
they "they beseiged Ahaz, but could not overcome
him." Now, Ahaz is the King of Judah in Jerusalem.
"At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered
Elath to Syria, and drave the JEWS from Elath:
and the Syrians came to Elath and dwelt there
unto this day." And you can keep reading the
whole chapter, it tells the story. The first
time the Jews are ever mentioned in the Bible,
who is fighting against the Jews? Israel.
Syria and Israel unite to fight against the
Jews. You say "I'm confused Pastor Anderson."
Let me explain it to you. When the children
of Israel first became a nation, they were
under the system of the Judges, right? And
for about the space of four hundred years,
they were under the system of the judges.
Well, after about years of the judges,
do you remember when they said "we want to
have a king so we can be like all the nations"?
What was the name of that first king? Saul.
So they were under king Saul, right? He reigned
for forty years. Then they had another king,
David. He reigned for how long? Forty years
again. Then they had a third king, Solomon.
How long did he reign for? Forty years. So,
Saul, David and Solomon each reigned for forty
years and they reigned over all the twelve
tribes of Israel. Did Solomon's son reign
over all tribes? No he did not, because
if you remember, because of Solomon's sins,
the kingdom was taken away from his son. But,
to keep His promise to David, He left a remnant
with Solomon, He left him two tribes and the
other ten tribes broke off and formed a seperate
nation in the north, under king Jeroboam.
So Solomon's son Rehoboam did not reign over
the tribes. He only reigned over the two
tribes. Because remember when Ahijah the Shilonite
came and preached to Jeroboam? He had a garment
in his hand, and he tore it into pieces,
and he said to him, take of them, representing
the tribes that would follow Jeroboam.
So, after king Solomon, we don't have a united
kingdom of Israel. Instead we have kingdoms.
The NORTHERN kingdom, which became known as
"Israel". And the SOUTHERN kingdom, which
became known as Judah. Now, here is where
some people get confused. When you try to
tell them that "Jews" are people who live
in "Judah", which is what they are, which
is why the first time we see "Jews" mentioned,
is after that split has taken place, and it
talks about Syria and Israel fighting against
Judah. He calls the people in Judah, "Jews",
and for the whole rest of the Bible when He
uses the term "Jews", He is talking about
people from Judah. Before that they were called
Israelites. When it was all the tribes,
or the hebrews. And even in the New Testament,
when He talks about all tribes, He refers
to them as "Israelites", when He is talking
about all tribes. But when He is talking
about people from the southen kingdom of Judah,
He calls them "the Jews". Now here is where
some people will mischaracterise what I'm
saying. They'll say "well, you're saying only
people from the tribe of Judah are Jews!"
No, that's not what I said. I said people
from the SOUTHERN KINGDOM of Judah are Jews.
And that is NOT just the tribe of Judah. Because
if you remember, that also included the Benjamites,
because the two tribes... remember? Ten and
two. Two of the tribes- Judah and Benjamin
were part of that southern kingdom. Also,
many of the Levites came down and were part
of that southern kingdom, because of the fact
that the Northern Kingdom went in to Apostasy
and worshipped false Gods. So alot of the
Levites stayed in the northern kingdom, alot
of them came and joined the southern kingdom.
So what we have in the southern kingdom of
Judah are the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and
alot of the Levites. That's primarily what
made up the southern kingdom. Now, because
the northern kingdom became so wicked and
apostate, many of the individuals from some
of the northern tribes, they came down and
immigrated into Judah, just because they didn't
want to live in the heathen northern kingdom.
Especially in the days of Hezekiah, they went
out and invited alot of those northern tribes
to come down into Judah. So of course, there
were some people from some of the northern
tribes coming down into Judah, but primarily,
ninety something per cent of the people living
in Judah, are of the two tribes. Judah and
Benjamin, and also the Levites. Those three
tribes, Judah, Benjamin and Levi, are going
to represent most of "the Jews", or people
of Judah. That's why when you get into the
New Testament, when it talks about people
being from a specific tribe, you've got alot
of people from Judah, you've got people from
Benjamin mentioned. The apostle Paul said
"I'm of Benjamin". Makes perfect sense because
he was part of that southern kingdom. You
only have one person in the entire New Testament
mentioned as being a part of one of the other
tribes, and that's the prophetess Anna, and
she was of the tribe of Asher. But the exception
proves the rule my friend. Most of the people
that were in Judea in Jesus' day, that were
called "the Jews", are of the tribes of Judah,
Benjamin and Levi. You say, "well, what happened
to the other ten tribes, what happened to
them?" Well, the ten tribes, the northern
kingdom of Israel was taken captive by the
Assyrians. Because remember how the JEWS were
taken captive by the Babylonians? Nebechunezzar.
And that's Daniel, that's his friends, that's
Ezekiel. And then remember the Jews come back
from Babylon? And we read about that in Ezra,
Nehemiah. That's the southern kingdom. What
happened in the northern kingdom? They were
taken captive, not by the Babylonians, they
were taken captive earlier by the Assyrians.
And when the Assyrians took them captive,
what they did is, they took all the people
that were educated and wealthy, and had anything
going for them... They took them captive to
their land, and they left the poor of the
land to stay in the northern kingdom of Israel
to till the land. All the poor people of the
ten tribes stayed in Israel. Then they brought
in all their heathens to intermarry with the
ten tribes that were left behind in that northern
kingdom of Israel, and those people became
known as "the samaritans". Because the capital
of Judah was Jerusalem, but the capital of
the northern kingdom of Israel was Samaria.
Now originally it was Tirzah. Later it became
Samaria. Omri bought the hill of Samaria.
He built his capital there. His son Ahab kept
it there. And pretty soon, God started to
sometimes refer to the whole northern kingdom
as Samaria, because the capital was Samaria.
So what we see is that the Assyrians took
the ten tribes captive, then brought in a
bunch of heathen that intermarried with the
ten tribes that were left behind. Not only
that, they begin to have a religion that was
a mixture of the biblical worship of the Lord,
mixing in heathen practices and heathen tradition.
Because you remember when the heathen came
in, lions came and there were alot of bad
things happening. And basically, the priests
of the northern kingdom, they started to create
a mixed religion. You read about this in the
book os nd Kings, where they said they worship
the Lord AND they worshipped all these other
Gods. They worshiped both. So they had a mixed
religion. Those people in the New Testament
are referred to as the Samaritans. Now remember
how the Jews hated the Samaritans? The Jews
had no dealings with the Samaritans? The reason
whu is because they looked at the Samaritans
as being totally polluted, as being totally
mixed with the heathen, both ethnically and
spiritually. Because remember, God had told
the Israelites not to mingle with the heathen,
not to marry the heathen. And this has nothing
to do with interracial marriage, because I
don't believe that interracial mariage is
a sin. But the Bible does teach that marrying
unbelievers or heathens is a sin. Now, what
happened in the Old Testament is that if a
person wanted to become a Jew, or join the
nation of Israel, they would have to be circumcised,
and then they could join the nation, and then
they could marry them. So it's not a racial
thing. But we see that the Samaritans had
completely mingled with the heathen, they
had completely lost their identity as Israelites,
lost their identidy of what tribe they were
from. They didn't have a genealogy to show
where they were from. And they became mingled
with the heathen, both physically and spiritually.
Therefore the Jews despised them and rejected
them. Now, the ten tribes who were acrried
captive, they never came back. They got mingled
and assimilated in with the countries to whom
they were brought. And then the ones who were
left behind, they were all mingled and mixed
in. That is why today those ten tribes are
lost. Now you can look this up, you can get
any kind of history book you want, you can
get an encyclopaedia and look up the tribe
of Reuben. Look up the tribe of Gad. Look
up the tribe of Asher. And you know what it's
going to tell you about the tribe of Reuben?
Any encyclopaedia will tell you this. It's
GONE. Did you hear me? It's gone. Because
look, they got mingled with the heathen hundred
of years go by, they don't know what tribe
they're of, they're just mixed in with the
heathen, they get completely mixed in with
other cultures and so forth. That's why today
the people you run into who call themself
"jews", if they can trace their lineage at
all, they're tracing it back to Judah, Benjamin
or Levi, per cent of the time. Because
that's who they came from. Judah. Whereas
alot of those northern tribes were lost. Now,
some of those tribes, you can say, okay, there's
this group over there that descends from the
tribe of Issachar, whatever. But some of the
tribes, for sure have been lost. You're not
going to find. Let me put it to you this way.
You're not going to find , people on
this earth who say "I'm of the tribe of Reuben".
You're not even going to find people of
the tribe of Reuben. In fact, you probably
can't find anybody who can prove to you that
they're from the tribe of Reuben. And not
only that, but they've been totally mingled
with the heathen. So the people that we think
of as "the Jews" today, you know what? That's
not going to make up the , because that
would only make up a couple of tribes. That
would only make up Judah, Benjamin, Levi.
That would be ,. But here is the thing.
Let's pretend for a minute that these people
who say "oh, the , JEWS, that's JEWS
in the last days that are all going to get
saved and turn to Christ." Well, wait a minute,
how are you going to find , that are
males, and that are virgins, and that are
believers in Jesus Christ? Look down at your
Bible there in Revelation , because that's
the bill that they have to fit. It says in
Revelation :, "These are they which were
not defiled with women; for they are virgins".
So they're men that were not defiled with
women, they're virgins, "these are they which
follow the Lamb withersoever he goeth. These
were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits
unto God and to the Lamb. And in their mouth
was found no guile: for they are without fault
before the throne of God." Now look, they're
believers, they're males, and they're virgins.
Are you going to tell me that you are going
to find , Jews today that fit that bill?
Let alone, twelve thousand from Reuben, twelve
thousand from Gad, that are going to fit that
bill. What some people believe gets even weirder,
they'll say this... "Oh, these people are
going to get saved after the rapture." Okay,
so now you're telling me you've got ,
male Jews that have kept their virginity,
even though they weren't saved, they just
stayed virgin. And they're just going to get
saved and become these great Christians right
away. Just following the Lamb whereever he
goes. No. Come on, it's far fetched. Oh it's
not far fetched. It's IMPOSSIBLE. I would
challenge you to even find , saved Jews,
let alone whether they're male, female, virgin
or have been married times. You're not going
to find them. And so what I'm trying to say
is that to believe that these , of the
twelve tribes of the children of Israel are
"Jews that are going to get saved in the last
times", is taking a very loose interpretation
of the passage. I don't take a look interpretation
of the passage. I'm taking it literally. And
when I say I am taking it literally, you know
what I mean by that? I'm saying that these
are , MEN from the tribe of Reuben. And
let me tell you something, that means that
they came from back when the tribe of Reuben
existed. The tribe of Reuben does not exist
today. Even at the time of Christ, the tribe
of Reuben had been all but decimated. And
people say "oh, it's people who are from Reuben
and don't even know it." That's far fetched.
But now think about this. I said earlier,
how do they get to heaven before the rapture?
By dying. So think about this now. What if
we just take the passage literally at face
value for what chapter and chapter are
actually saying, and what if we say this...
Okay, they're already in heaven, because they've
already died, because they're Old Testament
saints. Now, could we go out today and find
, male virgins that are believers in
Christ from the tribe of Reuben to fit this
bill? No. But what if we looked at the history
of the children of Israel spanning thousands
of years, right? All the ones who were saved
and in heaven right now, could we find ,
saved Reubenites that were male virgins who
died, that are up in heaven? I'm sure we could
easily find that, looking over the centuries
of history. You understand what I'm saying?
So basically, these are Old Testament believers,
these are Old Testament saints of these literal
tribes that are up in heaven. And they get
this special priveledge of being able ot be
sealed, and basically come back to this earth
to preach the gospel, okay? Now it makes perfect
sense. You say "well, how could they come
back to earth after they've died?" Newsflash!
We're all coming back! Because after the rapture,
we go up to heaven, right? But then don't
we come back to this earth on white horses
in Revelation to rule and reign with Christ
for a thousand years? So we're all coming
back. These guys are just coming back a few
years early. They're going to be here during
the plagues. That's why the Bible says they
have to get that seal in their forehead, to
make them immune from the plagues. That's
why when the fifth trumpet sounds, and the
locusts from hell come, they stay away from
the ,. It says that they torment everybody
who doesn't have the seal of God in their
foreheads. So they're tormenting everybody
except these ,. And look, remember in
Revelation , we talked about how the two
witnesses are Moses and Elijah come back?
So it makes sense. If Moses and Elijah are
coming back, it makes sense that the ,
are coming back. And that they're from the
literal tribes. It's the only way to take
it literally. If you are going to spiritualise
it and say "well, they're just kind of spiritually
from the tribe of Reuben." Well, you know
what? The only way to make them physically
from the tribe of Reuben, from the literal
tribe, would be that they'd have to be from
the Old Testament. So that these guys are
just like Moses and Elijah coming back from
the Old Testament. These guys are coming back
from the Old Testament, and they're going
to be on this earth during the time that the
plagues are poured out. So they're not people
that are left behind in the rapture, because
no believer is going to be left behind during
the rapture. They're people that are coming
back, basically as we're going up, they're
coming down. Basically they're taking our
place. Because think about this. When the
rapture takes place, all the saved are caught
up to heaven, right? Who is going to be left
behind to represent the gospel on this earth?
Who is going to do the soul winning? Is God
just going to leave this earth without any
witness, without any hope? Without any preaching
of His word? You say "well, Moses and Elijah
will take care of that?" Two guys? You've
got billions of people in this world, two
guys are going to take care of that? See,
these ,, I believe during the time when
God's wrath is poured out, while we're up
in heaven, I believe that on this earth Moses
and Elijah are obviously going to... The two
witnesses whoever they are, I believe it's
Moses and Elijah... They're going to have
a more public ministry, because the Bible
talks alot about everybody in the world hearing
their preaching, and hating them and being
happy when they die. I think the , will
have a more local ministry, because they can
be scattered throughout the whole world. And
just as the apostles in acts , remember,
they were all Galileans but they spake with
other tongues, and they were able to give
the gospel to people from all over the world.
I think the , are going to come back
to preach the gospel to all nations and languages
and tongues. And they will be here, since
we're going to be gone, they're going to be
here. They are going to be immune from the
plagues of God's wrath. They are not going
to be tormented with locusts, and they will
be here to preach the gospel. You say "well,
how do you know they are going to be preaching
the gospel. Well, look at the next verse after
the , are described. It says "they are
without fault before the throne of God"- look
at verse - " And I saw another angel fly
in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting
gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the
earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and
tongue, and people. Saying with a loud voice,
Fear God and give glory to him; for the hour
of his judgement is come: and worship him
that made heaven, and earth, and the sea,
and the fountains of waters." So what we see
hear, right after we talk about the ,
the next verse talks about preaching the gospel
to every nation, kindred, tongue and people.
So that kind of gives some sense to why they're
there. Because in Revelation , He didn't
really tell us why they're there. Here we
get an idea why they're there, to preach the
gospel. You say "well, the angel is going
to do that". Well, he has the gospel to preach
unto them, but I think that the , are
going to be preaching that same gospel. Now,
alot of people who have a false doctrine will
point to Revelation : to say "well, there
is different gospels". And these dispensationalists
are followers of the false teacher Peter Ruckman,
who says "there are actually different gospels".
Well let me tell you something, "if anybody
preaches another gospel, let him be accursed",
because there is but one. And anybody who
tells you there is another gospel, let him
be accursed. And people come to you telling
you... Somebody said to me recently, "Paul
preached a different gospel than Jesus". Anybody
who says that is a heretic and a false teacher.
Because if Paul preached another gospel than
Jesus, he is saying Jesus is accursed. He
is saying anybody who preaches Jesus' gospel
is accursed. Because he said "if anybody preaches
another gospel than the one that I preach,
let him be accursed!" Are you saying that
every follower of Christ is accursed? See
that kind of GARBAGE is believed by the simple
and the ignorant. But let me tell you something.
There is ONE GOSPEL, and if anyone preaches
ANY OTHER GOSPEL, than that which we have
received, it says in Galatians , let that
person be accursed. You say, "well, it's for
different times." Well, goodnight, you just
preach the right gospel at the wrong time
and you're cursed! That doesn't make any sense.
That's baloney. There is but one gospel of
Jesus Christ. They say "well, this angel is
preaching a different gospel". It doesn't
say that he is preaching the gospel with what
he says in verse . It just says "he HAS the
everlasting gospel to go preach, and here
is what he says". What he says is not the
gospel. By the way, if it's only for a certain
time period, why is it called "the everlasting
gospel"? Sounds to me like it's going to last
forever. And guess what? That gospel is the
death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The gospel is the good news that Jesus died
for our sins, according to the scriptures.
And that's great news that he died for our
sins, because we have alot of sins. And we
need a saviour. And THANK GOD that Jesus Christ
DIED for our sins. And listen, when he says
"according to the scriptures". Is he talking
about the Old Testament or the New Testament?
THE OLD TESTAMENT! Because in 1st Corinthians,
alot of the New Testament hadn't even been
written yet. And in 1st Corinthians , it
says he died for our sins according to the
scriptures, talking about the Old Testament
scriptures. And by the way, the Bible says
"to him give ALL the prophets witness". You
say, "the Old Testament is not about Jesus".
Oh, it's ALL about Jesus. To him give ALL
the prophets witness, that through HIS NAME,
whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission
of sins, even the Old Testament points to
that. They didn't know that name in the Old
Testament. But it pointed to the fact that
whosoever believeth in him should receive
remission of sins through his name. And here's
the thing, that gospel is the same gospel
that Jesus preached and it's the same gospel
that Paul preached. See, this is what people
will say. "Well, Paul..." These dispensationalists,
these Ruckmanites. Here is what they'll teach.
"Well the gospel of Paul preached, was a gospel
by grace through faith..." And what they're
teaching is that Jesus taught a works salvation.
Do you believe that? Listen, anybody who has
ever gone to heaven, went by grace. Because
you know what grace means? They didn't deserve
it. Do you think Abel deserved to go to heaven?
Do you think Noah deserved to go to heaven?
The drunk that he was. I mean, do you think
Abraham deserved it? Do you think Isaac deserved
it? Do you think Jacob deserved it? Look,
there is NONE righteous, no not ONE. For ALL
have sinned of the glory of God. That includes
the Old Testament saints. David was not perfect.
David had sin. David did not earn his way
into heaven. Even as David also describeth
the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth
righteousness without works, saying BLESSED
are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and
whose sins are covered. BLESSED is the man
to whom the Lord will not impute sin. That's
what David preached, that it's without works.
Abraham believed that it was without works.
It's always been by grace through faith. And
here is what's so silly. They say "well, Paul
preached that it is by grace through faith,
he revealed that". Okay, so are you telling
me that Jesus didn't teach salvation by faith
alone? How about this verse that Jesus taught?
"For God so loved the world that he gave his
only begotten Son that whosoever believeth
in him should not perish, but have everlasting
life." Did Jesus teach that verse to Nicodemus?
Did he teach :? "He that believeth on him
is not condemned: but he that believeth not
is condemned already, because he hath not
believed in the name of the only begotten
Son of God." Did he teach the verse that said
"Verily, verily I say unto you, he that heareth
my word, and believeth on him that sent me
hath everlasting life, and shall not come
into condemnation, but is passed from death
unto life". He said that in John :. That's
JESUS preaching salvation by faith! He said
in John :, "Verily, Verily I say unto you,
I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath
everlasting life." Is that salvation by faith?
What about when Jesus said at the raising
of Lazarus, "I am the resurrection and the
life. He that believeth in me, though he were
dead, yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth
and believeth in me shall never die. Believest
thou this?" Is that salvation by faith? See
how Jesus taught over and over again that
salvation is by faith? That's why if somebody
tells you that Jesus and Paul preached two
different gospels, you can know that that
person is a heretic, a false prophet, a false
teacher, let them be accursed. They need to
learn the true gospel of Jesus Christ, which
is the same one that Paul preached. It's the
everlasting gospel. So don't let people try
to point this out to you- "See verse is
another gospel!" No it isn't. That's not the
gospel, it's just saying that the angel had
the gospel, and here is what the angel said.
The angel is going to preach the gospel to
the earth with a loud voice, saying "Fear
God and give glory to him; for the hour of
his judgment is come: and worship him that
made heaven, and earth, and the sea and the
fountains of waters." That's not good news.
Gospel means "good news". Is it good news
that God is about to pour out His wrath on
you? The good news is that Jesus died for
their sins, that's what they need to hear.
The , are going to preach that message.
Most people aren't going to listen. Moses
and Elijah, the two witnesses will preach
that message. Most people won't listen. Let's
keep reading. It says in verse , there followed
another angel. So there are three angels that
give these messages at this time, right before
God begins to pour out His wrath, they give
these messages. Verse , here's the next message.
"And there followed another angel, saying,
Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city,
because she made all nations drink of the
wine of the wrath of her fornication. And
the third angel followed them, saying with
a loud voice, If any man worship the beast
and his image, and receive his mark in his
forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink
of the wine of the wrath of God, which is
poured out without mixture into the cup of
his indignation; and he shall be tormented
with fire and brimstone in the presence of
the holy angels, and in the presence of the
Lamb." You know what blows my mind about this
verse? That people teach that hell is separation
from God. Does that not say that people are
going to be tormented in the presence of the
Lamb? Correct me if I'm wrong, the "the Lamb"
God? Jesus Christ is the Lamb. And the Bible
also says, "If I make my bed, behold, thou
art there." So here He says that they will
be tormented with fire and brimstone in the
presence of the holy angels and in the presence
of the Lamb, verse , and the smoke of their
torment ascendeth up forever and ever, and
they have no rest day nor night who worship
the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth
the mark of his name". Let me ask you this,
does that sound like hell is temporary? That
says that "the smoke of their torment ascendeth
up forever and ever". And people say "well,
that's just the smoke going up forever and
ever. The torment doesn't last forever." Look
at the next words. He shall be tormented with
fire and brimstone in the presence of the
holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
And the smoke of thir torment ascendeth up
for ever and ever: and they have no rest day
nor night". Does that sound like they're just
burned up and it's over? No. It says "they
have no rest day nor night, who worship the
beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth
the mark of his name. Here is the patience
of the saints: here are they that keep the
commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."
What's that saying in verse ? It's saying
"look, the patience of the saints, is that
when we see evil people prosper, when we see
great persecution coming from the wicked,
we know where they're going to end up." And
therefore we patiently whatever trials and
tribulations come our way. And sometimes it's
easy to get angry and say "God, why do you
let these evil people get away with the things
they do?" Nobody is going to get away with
it. But look at chapter , let me just prove
to you that hell is eternal, because alot
of people teach that hell is "annihilation".
They teach that you burn up and that's it.
Well, the Bible says that they are going to
be tormented day and night, and the smoke
of their torment ascendeth up forever and
ever. But look at Revelation , verse .
Now, what's interesting is that at the end
of chapter , the antichrist and the false
prophet are cast into the lake of fire. Then
there is a thousand years of Christ's reign.
So a THOUSAND years AFTER the beast and the
false prophet have been cast in the lake of
fire, look what the Bible says in verse -
"and the devil that deceived them was cast
into the lake of fire and brimstone, where
the beast and the false prophet" what's the
next word? "ARE". Does it say "where they
WERE"? This is THOUSAND years after they got
there! It says "where the beast and the false
prophet ARE, and shall be tormented day and
night FOR EVER and EVER." So is the lake of
fire a place where you just burn up and it's
over? No, he said a thousand years, they're
still there. And they shall be tormented for
ever and ever. And then look at Revelation
:. It says "But the fearful, and unbelieving,
and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second
death." Look , every single one of us has
told a lie. Let me tell you something, we
all deserve hell. And without Jesus Christ
as their saviour, this is where all liars
will end up. This is where murderers will
end up, this is where sorcerers will end up,
this is where whoremongers will be, in the
lake of fire for eternity, with the false
prophet. And let me tell you something. The
only way to escape this is to believe on the
Lord Jesus Christ. The Bible says "believe
on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou SHALT BE
SAVED." And the Bible says that God, those
of us that are saved, He has seperated us
from our sins as far as the east is from the
west. You say, "how is a liar like you going
to make it in? How is a murderer like David
going to make it in? How did that whoremonger
make it in? You know what? Through the blood
of the Lamb. SAVED from our sins. Sins FORGIVEN
and forgotten as far as the east is from the
west. That's salvation. But to the unsaved,
make no mistake, hell is eternal. The lake
of fire is a place of eternal torment and
punishment. The Bible says "these shall go
away into EVERLASTING punishment". That's
a punishment that lasts forever, "but the
righteous into life eternal". Go back to Revelation
. It says in verse , "And I heard a voice
from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed
are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth:
Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest
from their labours; and their works do follow
them." Why? He's saying "look, they're about
to rest". "Blessed are the dead which die
in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the
Spirit, that they may rest from their labours;
and their works do follow them. And I looked,
and behold a white cloud"- here is Jesus coming
in the clouds. "And upon the cloud, one sat
like unto the Son of man". Some people will
say "well, it's not the Son of man, it's just
LIKE him." It's him, okay? He comes in the
clouds and he's got on his head a golden crown
and in his hand a sharp sickle. And some people
say "well WHY does he need this other angel
to tell him it's time if he's the boss?" Well,
of course he's the boss. But you remember,
when Jesus was on this earth, and he talked
about his coming, he said "of that day and
hour knoweth no man, no not the angels in
heaven but my Father only". And in Mark ,
he said "of that day and hour knoweth no man".
He said "the angels don't know it, neither
the SON! The Son doesn't know it, the Father
only". That's why he is notified when the
time comes, it's just symbolic, obviously.
Obviously it's just part of the symbolism
that the angel tells him, "it's time for thee
to reap". He reaps the earth, he gathers the
elect, he gathers the believers, he gathers
the wheat into his barn, and we already covered
that earlier in the sermon. Then another angel
comes and reaps the clusters of the vine of
the earth, to cast them into the great winepress
of the wrath of God. Now let me ask you this.
Is the "winepress of the wrath of God", a
literal winepress? Obviously this isn't literal.
Now you say, "well, Pastor Anderson, how do
you know when things in the Bible are literal,
and when they're figurative?" Here is a really
easy rule of thumb for you. We should always
assume that the Bible is literal, unless it's
OBVIOUS that it's not literal. Now, you say
"well, where do you base that on?" Isn't that
just how we talk to each other in real life?
I mean, if I talk to you, if I say something
to you, wouldn't you assume it's literal unless
it's obvious that it's not? For example, think
about my wife and I. My wife and I communicate
on a daily basis, right? What if my wife just
decided that everything that I say is symbolic?
Wouldn't that be annoying? And I think God
gets pretty annoyed, when everything he says,
people say "oh that's symbolic, that's symbolic,
everything is symbolic." Now look, if I'm
being symbolic, it's going to be obvious that
it's symbolic. For example, if my wife says
to me, "honey, would you please take out the
trash?" Should I take that literally, or symbolically?
When she says "honey, would you please take
out the trash?" And I say, "maybe what she
is really saying, is that there is alot of
bad things in our relationship that she'd
like to see removed... maybe she is talking
about getting some bad things out of our relationship,
emotionally, spiritually." Do you really think
that that would make any sense? Or would I
just assume that she is saying "take out the
trash"? It makes sense, right? What if I said
to her, "honey, I would like Tacos for dinner.
Would you please make Tacos?" And she thought
"maybe what he really means, is that he wants
us to start speaking spanish more. Maybe he
wants to take that vacation to Cancun... It's
ALL figurative, it's ALL symbolic... Tacos
represents...." NO! I'm talking about a Taco!
That's what I want to eat! I want Tacos! And
what if I said "honey, would you fry the corn
tortillas in oil?" And she thought "maybe
the oil represents the holy spirit there..."
I mean, how far are you going to take this?
So usually, when my wife and I communicate,
usually what we say is literal. So shouldn't
I just assume that what she says is literal,
unless it's obvious that it's not, and vice
versa. And what if I said to my wife "it's
raining cats and dogs outside?" Isn't it pretty
clear that that's not literal? She knows "okay,
there aren't pets falling from the sky, it's
just raining heavily." Or if I say "honey,
you look like a million dollars", she is not
going to take that literally. But, she is
going to understand, "okay, that's figurative".
It's the same way in the Bible. It's obvious
when it's figurative folks. When God's talking
about "gathering the cluster of the vine of
the earth, and throwing it in the great winepress
of the wrath of God, and then BLOOD coming
out of the winepress up to the horse bridles
by the space of a THOUSAND and SIX HUNDRED
furlongs", that's NOT literal. And here's
why. Because you don't throw grapes into a
winepress and have BLOOD come out. What really
comes out of a winepress when you put grapes
in? WINE. So clearly not literal here. And
look, God's not going to gather up human beings
and put them in a literal winepress, and smash
humans until blood comes out like wine. That's
clearly not a literal event. But it is symbolic.
What this is referring to is that mankind
is about to enter the winepress of God's wrath.
Meaning that mankind is about to face the
intense wrath of God. And that man's blood
will be shed. And that if we were to take
all the blood that's going to be shed of man,
and we were to put it all in one place, it
would flow up to the horse bridles by the
space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.
So this is clearly figurative. And what this
is saying is, that AFTER the rapture, God's
going to pour out his wrath on mankind. That's
why we see the rapture in verses through
, and then in verses through , we see
mankind, the unsaved that have been left behind
going into the winepress of God's wrath. Then
in chapter ... Because sometimes we just
stop at the chapter division... You need to
keep reading, because when chapter : tells
us about the winepress of God's wrath, look
at the next verse. "And I saw another sign
in heaven, great and marvellous, seven angels
having the seven last plagues; for in them
is filled up the wrath of God." So you see
how it's really clear here? When he talks
about them going into the winepress of God's
wrath, that is FIGURATIVE, they're going into
the seven last plagues of God's wrath, THAT'S
the winepress of God's wrath. It culminates
in the battle of Armageddon in chapter number
, which is discussed in chapter , it culminates
in chapter . But really, the whole period
of God's wrath is signified by the winepress
of the wrath of God. You get that when you
read from : to :, it's just clear,
it's obvious. Now, you say, "well, how far
is a furlong?" Well, believe it or not, a
furlong is a measurement that we use today,
we just don't call it a furlong. You know
what we call it today? A "block". A "block"
is a "furlong". And the reason I say that,
is because a furlong, is exactly and eigth
of a mile. And in fact, the "furlong" comes
from the word "furrow", and the word "long",
the "long furrow". This is how much a man
would plow with one man, with one mule, in
one day, something like that. He would plow
an acre, right? And an acre is a furlong,
by this many chains or whatever. I'm sorry,
I'm not a medieval farmer. But I do know this,
a furlong is an eight of a mile, and it's
the length of the long furrow, which is part
of an acre. Now, the reason I say that a furlong
is equivalent to a block, is because, for
example in Phoenix, the numbered streets are
exactly and eight of a mile apart. So for
example, we're on th street, if we were
to go to th street, that's exactly mile.
If we were to go to nd street, that's another
mile, because every blocks, or every streets,
we have a mile. So therefore, from th to
th is an eight of a mile. They're roughly
an eighth of a mile apart. Therefore, central
avenue in Phoenix to th street is how many
furlongs? furlongs, right? Which is miles.
So th Street to th Avenue, you can always
do the math and figure out exactly how many
FURLONGS it is, but you usually divide it
by eight. And I do this all the time. When
I am coming home from Los Angeles, and I am
anxious to get home, I will look at the avenue
signs and say "okay, how far am I from home?"
Because I live right off th street, near
the church. So, as I'm driving home, I'll
say "okay, street, divide by , that's
six miles... Okay, I'm on th Avenue, that's
another and something odd... okay, I'm about..."
You know, it just gives me roughly an idea
of how far I have to go, because a block is
a furlong, an eighth of a mile. So when the
Bible says "by the space of a thousand and
six hundred furlongs, if we divide that by
eight, you're looking at miles. Now, think
about a horse bridle. Think about a horse's
mouth. That's about what, this level, right?
(Gestures) Now think of this deep of blood,
for miles? That's a pretty long river
of blood, isn't it? That's a river of blood
thats this deep. I guess it depends on the
horse, but we are not talking about these
miniature ponies. But we're talking about
a horse bridle. And we're talking about
mile long river of blood this deep. We're
talking about some serious wrath of God. That's
the winepress of God's wrath. That's what
mankind is going into. Thank God for Christ's
coming in the clouds in verse to get us
out of here before this takes place. But woe
unto them that are upon the earth during that
period of God's wrath. So chapter is a
fascinating chapter. It's one of the more
difficult chapters, it's one of the more cryptic
chapters. But the key to understanding it
is first of all, get it in it's proper chronology.
And alot of people will tell you "well, chapter
is just totally outside the chronology
of Revelation." But really it fits in perfectly
if you expect it to be like the first half
of Revelation. Tribulation, ,, rapture,
and then God pours out his wrath. You know
what? Revelation follows that sequence
perfectly. And so it's a really interesting
chapter. Next sermon we will get into the
seven plagues of God's wrath, with chapters
and , where we'll delve into the carnage
there. Similar to the things we saw back in
chapters through . Let's bow our heads
and have a word of prayer. Father we thank
you so much for your word, and we thank you
for Revelation chapter . Please help us
to study to show ourselves approved unto God,
workmen that need not to be ashamed, rightly
dividing the word of truth and understanding
the difference between Old Testament and New
Testament. Dividing between Old Covenant and
New Covenant. Dividing between Jew and
tribes of Israel, not the same thing. And
Father please just help us as we study the
book of Revelation to learn as much as we
can. Thank you for the salvation that you've
given us, and that you've saved us from the
wrath to come, that we're going to see in
the next few chapters. In Jesus' name we pray,
amen.
|