"The Homo Agenda vs Reality" Christian Preaching (Baptist KJV sermon)


April 3, 2016

The title of my sermon tonight is this: The Homo Agenda versus Reality. The Homo Agenda versus Reality. Today, there was a great big event in our city known as Phoenix Pride. Basically, this involved a bunch of Sodomites and filthy perverts parading around and just openly displaying their disgusting and filthy, wicked lifestyle as if it were something to be proud of. When it is actually something that is shameful. The Bible even says it's a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret and yet they openly paraded this wickedness today through our city.

It's my job as a pastor in this city to preach against this garbage. Somebody has to cry aloud and spare not and warn the people of God's wrath against this kind of sin and iniquity. Let me start out by saying this, the homo agenda that is being pushed by the media, the television, the Hollywood movies, the music industry, the magazines. This agenda paints a picture of homosexuality that does not represent reality and that's why the title of my sermon is the The Homo Agenda versus Reality.

On one side, we have what the media tells us about the homos which shall henceforth be referred to as sodomites, queers, faggots, whatever you want to call them. On one hand we have what the media tells us about these sodomites and then on the other hand we have what the Bible tells us about these sodomites and the question is, which of these two views represents reality tonight. They can't both be right. What the media shows us about this lifestyle or what I would call a death style is in direct opposition to what the Bible tells us about it and so they can't both be right. Somebody is wrong here, somebody is lying. Either Hollywood's lying or the Bible is lying. Either the TV is lying or the Bible is lying and the question is, which of these two views represents reality?

This sermon tonight is preached unto those who are truth seekers. Those who love the truth. Those who care about what is actually right and what is wrong. There are plenty of people out there who are not truthers. They don't care what the truth is, they have a certain bias, they have a certain agenda, they have a pre-determined conclusion and they're going to stick with that opinion no matter what facts or evidence you show them, no matter what you show them from the Bible or from anywhere else. They just want to believe what they want to believe and there's nothing you can really do for people like that. They don't love the truth.

This sermon tonight is for those who actually want to know the truth. Those who actually care. Those who are actually open minded enough to receive the truth even if it's different than what our mainstream culture is cramming down our throat. I'm going to identify a few key areas where this homo agenda that's portrayed in the media, deviates from reality. What I'm going to do is I'm going to show you both sides, I'll tell you, "Here's what the world is saying and here's what God's saying in the Bible." Then we'll test it and let's see which one represents reality tonight.

Let's start in Romans chapter one, because Romans Chapter one is a great place to start any sermon. In Romans chapter number one, we have the definitive New Testament text on homosexuality more than any other. This is just a clear scripture where half the chapter is pretty much dedicated to this subject so it's a great starting point. One of the first lies that I want to point out or one of the first statements of this homo agenda that's pushed in the media, is that they're born that way. Isn't that something that's pushed in the media, that's pushed in the pop culture? It seems like any time you talk to anyone about this subject they come at you with, "Pastor Anderson, they're born that way."

That's not what the Bible teaches. That's in direct opposition with what the Bible teaches because God gave us Romans chapter one to tell them how they got that way and let me tell you something, they are that way. There is a difference between these people and the rest the population. Sadly, modern Christianity has tried to just ignore this and say, "Oh, they're just like everybody else, it's just the same thing." No, they're not just like everybody else because of the fact that the vast majority of the population has zero interest in that kind of a relationship and not only do 96 - 97% of men have zero interest in that kind of relationship with another dude, they find it repulsive, they find it disgusting and repugnant.

It's not even that they don't want to do it, it's that it's pretty much one of the grossest things they can imagine. Then there's a certain segment of the population that desires that relationship, that is insatiable for that kind of relationship, so there's clearly something wrong with these people or something .. If you say it's not wrong, If you're one of these brainwashed buffoons then, how about this, there's something different about these people. Everybody should be able to agree on that. I don't care if you're an atheist, I don't care if you're the biggest homo activist, you have to admit that there's something different going on in these people's minds that will cause one person to desire what another person finds repugnant. There's something going on.

The question is, how did they get that way? The world says they're born that way. What does the Bible say? Let's look at what the Bible says. The Bible explains us in Romans one how they got that way. It says in verse 21: Because that when they knew God, they glorified him not as God. Neither were thankful but became vain in their imaginations and their foolish heart was darkened, professing themselves to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man and to birds and four footed beasts and creeping things. Wherefore, meaning for this reason, God also gave them up to uncleanliness through the lusts of their own hearts to discern of their own bodies between themselves, who changed the truth of God into a lie and worshiped and served the creature more than the creator who is blessed forever, Amen.

For this cause, see there is a cause, isn't there, there is a reason. For this cause, God gave them up on to vile affections for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature and likewise also the men leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another. Men with men, working that which is unseemly and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meat and even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind to do those things which are not convenient.

The Bible clearly talks about it here, man with man doing that which is unseemly, doing that which is vile, doing that which is against nature. How did they get that way? The Bible tells us three times. God often repeats things, twice, three times when he wants to get through our heads, when he wants to emphasize it to us. That's why he said, God gave them up. God gave them up. God gave them over. Why did God three times, it says, why did God give them over to vile affections. Give them over to the uncleanness of their own lusts, why? Because the Bible says that they didn't even want to retain God in their knowledge.

The Bible said that when they knew God, meaning that they were exposed to who God was, they did not glorify Him as God, they were not thankful, they became vain in their own imagination, they refused to worship the Creator and the Bible tells us that even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge. They hated God so much, they didn't even want to think about God or even remember that he existed in the same way God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient, meaning they don't come naturally. Then just a few verses later, he says that these people, in verse 30, are haters of God.

According to Romans chapter one, the way that they got that way, was by rejecting the Lord. It's that simple. Men who burn in lust with other men, even the women who burn in lust one toward another, against nature. The Bible teaches that they got that way by rejecting the Lord, by hating the Lord, by not wanting to retain the Lord. When it says that they didn't want to retain God in their knowledge, it's not saying they didn't want to think about any god, it's that they didn't want to accept the true God. They didn't want to retain the God in the bible of their knowledge, they hate the God of the Bible. That's how they got that way.

Listen, I'm an independent Baptist pastor, I was raised an independent Baptist and I've listened to countless thousands of hours of Independent Baptist preaching in my life and I just don't get it how so many people can read this passage and not understand what's being said. Because to me, this is a real clear passage. In fact I remember I won somebody onto Christ out soul winning. I believe she was like maybe a 17, 18 year old girl that got saved at soul winning. I've given her the Gospel, she received Christ as Savior, she got saved and I was waiting because my solid partner had started up a conversation with someone else and was winning someone else unto the Lord so I was kind of hanging around. This girl came back up to me and she was looking into our church and reading up on what we believed and everything. She was looking at the little invite that I had given her and she got to the part where it basically gave our stance against homosexuality.

She came up and asked me about it like, "Whoa, what's going on with this? Why are you against the homos?" She was kind of perplexed by it, because she had just got saved a couple minutes ago and didn't really know anything about what the Bible taught. I said "Well, let me show you in the Bible." I showed her a few scriptures in the Bible, I took her to Leviticus 20:13 and I said, "What does this mean?" She told me exactly what it meant. I took her to Romans chapter one. This girl didn't have a background of being trained in the Bible or growing up in church or anything. I read through this with her.

I didn't tell her anything about it, I just asked her,"What do you think this is saying? What do you think this means?" She expounded it to me perfectly, she said, "Basically it's saying that because they turned away from the Lord and hated the Lord, he turned them over to do this weird stuff, this vile stuff. Men with men. That's why they're like ... " It just clicked with her, it just made sense because it's really not that complicated, especially when he says it three times. God gave them up, God gave them over, God gave them up. Yet all over America today are even Independent Baptist pastors who just refuse to acknowledge what this passage is teaching. You try to tell them, "Hey, these people have been given over to a reprobate mind." They don't believe that.

They make no mention, they preach about it in their sermons. They make no mention of them being given up. They make no mention of them being given over. They make no mention of the term reprobate. They make no mention of any of these clear teachings. They just get up and talk about gay marriage. Why? Because they're listening to more talk radio than they're reading in this book, that's the problem. They're listening to Sean Hannity more than they're listening to Alexander Scoby and so they're getting their mind filled with all the talking points of the world instead of what the Bible teaches.

This whole thing of gay marriage, here's what I always say to people, I always say, every marriage I've ever performed has been a gay marriage. "How do you feel about gay marriage?" I'm in a gay marriage because gay means happy. People are twisting the meaning of the word. When the Bible use the word gay, it means happy and cheerful. Here's the thing, If you go to a marriage and it's not gay, something's wrong with that marriage. Obviously, later on the marriage might be on the rocks, but goodnight if you're at the wedding and people aren't gay, something's wrong.

That sounds weird to you, because you've been listening to a bunch of queers telling you what the word gay means. The word gay means happy and cheerful. You don't even have to go back that far and that's what it meant. I mean how old is the Flintstones. Was that a cartoon from what the 50s, 60s? Flintstones, meet the Flintstones yabba dabba doo time, a dab a do time, we'll have a gay old time. Why? Because that word has always just meant cheerful, happy, friendly. Whenever people say, "What do you have against gay people?" I say, "Absolutely nothing. I love gay people. I'm gay" They say, "I hope one of your children turns out to be gay." I'm like, "I hope they all turn out to be gay. I want them to be happy as much as I'm happy but what I don't want them to be is a filthy faggot or a sodomite or a pervert." The point is, there's a big difference though. We're letting the world twist our definitions.

The reason that I want to stick with the biblical definition of gays, is because gay is used in the Bible so therefore it becomes a word that we shouldn't tamper with. That's why we should never use it to describe these filthy perverts because it's not a happy lifestyle anyway. I think it's pretty clear, I don't see how this goes over a lot of people's heads tonight. I pray that this audience that we have here tonight is all got a King James Bible in your lap and you're all looking down, it's really clear how they got that way, by rejecting the Lord. Which is their choice. They decided to do that. They chose not to retain God in their knowledge. They chose not to be thankful, they chose not to worship the Creator. They chose to do these things and therefore God gave them over unto vile affections to do those things, men with men, women with women, etc, case closed.

What does the world say, The world says they're born that way. Let me ask you, Are these two ideas compatible? Here's the thing, which one is true? Which one is real? Here's what's interesting, I went to some scientific studies that have been done on this because there have actually been some studies to figure out whether they're born that way. Why? Because the homo agenda is falling all over themselves trying to prove that they're born that way in order to say, "We can't help it, give us rights, we're a minority." They basically compare themselves to black people. They basically say, "This is the new civil rights movement. In the 60s it was black people and now it's the homos." I were a black person, I'd be pretty offended by that. Those of you who are here tonight that are black, do you like being lumped in with a bunch of perverts and homos?

There's nothing in the world wrong with being black. Everybody is all of the same one blood according to the Bible. Red and yellow, black and white, there are precious in his sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world and a black person has every bit as much character and value as a white person, as an Asian person. Whatever the case may be, race doesn't matter in God's eyes. We're all human beings. People's individual character is what determines their value not the color of their skin. Are there black people that are evil? Yeah. Then there are Godly, righteous black people and then white people, same thing, wicked and evil white people, Godly white people, it's meaningless. It's just the color of your skin, it makes no difference. Just like the color of your eyes or the color of your hair doesn't make any difference. It's just the way that you look.

It's meaningless whether you're tall or short or whatever. It doesn't mean anything. They're trying to compare that to being a deviant, to being a pervert, to being one of these weirdos. They want to prove that you're born that way but here's the thing, the science just isn't there ,they can't find it. That doesn't stop people from telling you all day long about the gay gene and they're born that way, even though there's no facts behind that. Listen to this, eight major identical twin studies prove that homosexuality is not genetic. There have been eight major studies of identical twins that have proven that it's not genetic. Why? Because identical twins have the same genes and not only do they have the same genes, they were actually in the same womb. They had the same environment within the womb.

It's only at birth that they're separated and have different experiences and different events happen in their lives but everything in the womb is the same. Their genes are identical. Now listen to this, eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the US and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: Homos were not born that way. They said gays but they're confused about what that word means. At best genetics is a minor factor says Dr. Neil Whitehead PhD. Whitehead worked for the New Zealand government as a scientific researcher. Oh, so he's not an independent Baptist pastor. No, he's a PhD, who works for the New Zealand government for 24 years and spent four years working for the United Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency. Most recently he serves as a consultant to Japanese universities about the effects of radiation exposure.

His PhD is in biochemistry and statistics. By the way, this is a statistical analysis. Are you listening? If you're studying identical twins and the prevalence of homosexuality in twins, then that would be a statistical discipline. He has a PhD in statistics and in bio chemistry which is also relevant. Identical twins have the same genes or DNA, they are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions. If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is a ... I may have to use the word a homo because they're misusing the word gay, and one twin is a homo, The co-twin should also be a homo because they have identical DNA, It ought to be 100%.

Dr. Whitehead notes, but the studies reveals something else. If an identical twin has same gender attraction, the chances that the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women. Are you getting this? 89% or 86% of them are straight even when their twin is a homo. How is it born that way? How are they genetic? It says, because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. No one is born a homo he notes, the predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.

Dr. Whitehead believes that same sex attraction is caused by non shared factors. Things happening to one twin but not the other or a personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the other. For example, one twin ... This is what he's saying. He's not approaching it from a Biblical view, he's just a statistics PhD who's doing a science experiment on this. He says, for example one twin might have exposure to pornography or sexual abuse but not the other. One twin may interpret and respond to their family or classroom environment differently than the other. These individual and idiosyncratic responses to random events and the common environmental factors predominate. How about this, one of them hates God and the other doesn't. One of them rejected the Lord and the other one is either just neutral toward the Lord or perhaps even believes on the Lord.

The first very reliable large study of identical twins was conducted in Australia in 1991 followed by a large US study about 1997. Then Australia and the US conducted more twin studies in 2000 followed by several studies in Scandinavia according to Dr Whitehead. Twin registers are the foundation of modern twin studies. There are now very large and exist in many countries. A gigantic European twin register with a projected 600,000 members is being organized but one of the largest in use is in Australia with more than 25,000 twins on the books.

A significant twin study among adolescents shows an even weaker genetic correlation. In 2002, Behrman and Brickner studied tens of thousands of adolescent students in the US, the same sex attraction [inaudible 00:21:30] between identical twins was only 7.7% for males and 5.3% for females lower then the 11% and 14% in the Australian study by Bailey et al conducted in 2000. I thought they're born that way, I thought it's all genetic I thought it's all determined in the womb. If they're born that way that means it happened where? In the womb or at conception. Yet the science isn't there. They want it to be there.

I've read many books about these type of subjects and it's so funny to listen to the authors falling all over themselves, trying to say, "Well, even though we've shown that it's not genetic and even though there are all these identical twin studies ... " Because they do acknowledge it, it's out there. They say, "Well, but there still could be something else going on in how they're born that way that we just haven't discovered yet." Then you'll get these articles in the media popping up of, Gay Gene Discovered. We've discovered the gene. Then you read the article though and it's like, oh well we think it could be in this one sector but we don't really know and we need more funding and we actually have no clue and even if we find it, it's probably just going to be a very minor factor.

What they do is they just write a big headline that makes it sound like, "Oh wow, we found it." Then when you read up on the studies, it isn't there. Does that stop 97% of people that you run into that are promoting this homo agenda from just telling you, "Science has proven that they're born that way." Totally without basis and you always say, "Where are the facts? Where are the science? Where are the studies?" I got my facts right here. Brackner and Bearman, what have you got? Nothing. It's unbelievable that people just keep repeating that lie. I'm just being honest tonight, we got the Bible saying one thing, We got the world telling us something else, which one represents reality? They're not born that way. There's science in there, the facts aren't there. The Bible was right. They got that way later.

Here's another lie, that's point number one. Point number two is this: The world tells us that homos desire to be monogamous. It's just a dude that wants to be married to another dude. Or it's just a woman who wants to be married to another woman. They just love each other. Why won't you just let them get married? That way they make this big issue about being married. I don't give a rip whether they get married or not, stone them with stones, but they sit there and make some big deal about whether they get married but here's why that's such a big issue. Is simply because of the fact that they want you to believe that that's the kind of relationships that they have, where it's just one man with one man when that's not true.

The Bible paints a different picture. Go to Genesis 19. Genesis 19, the world paints a picture of a couple of dudes in a relationship, just like a man and a woman except they just happen to be a couple of dude's or a couple of women in a relationship. It's just like a normal relationship between husband and wife, they just happen to both be female but they want you to believe that these people engage in 'normal relationships' in the sense that they are somewhat monogamous or at least monogamous at times, but what does the Bible teach? The Bible teaches that they don't desire a monogamous relationship, they desire strangers. That's what the Bible teaches, the Bible teaches that what they're really looking for is encounters with strangers. They want to have a physical relationship with complete strangers that they've never met before. That's what the Bible says.

Let's look at it in the Bible tonight and then we'll test it with reality. Genesis Chapter 19 is of course very famous story of Sodom and Gomorrah where we derive the term Sodomite. In this story, we have two men enter the city and we know that they are angels as the readers but Lot doesn't know that and the men of Sodom don't do that because these look like just two ordinary men. These two ordinary men walk into Sodom and the Bible says in verse number two, and he said this is Lot when he meets them, "And he said, Behold now my lords turn and I pray you into your servant's house and tarry all night and wash your feet and you shall rise up early and go on your ways." They said, "Nay, but will buy in the street all night."

These two guys are just saying, "No, no. We're just going to camp in the street. We're just going to sleep here." Lot tells them, No, don't think that. Verse three: And he pressed against them greatly, Meaning he told them, "Look, please come stay at my house, do not stay in the street." They turned in on him and entered into his house and he made them a feast and he baked unleavened bread and they did eat. Before they lay down, the men of the city watched this, even the men of Sodom compassed the house round, don't miss this; Both old and young, all the people from every quarter. Is this a lot of people or what? This is just a huge throng of the men of Sodom, young and old. Says, the men of Sodom, from every quarter, both old and young they called onto Lot, Verse Five, and said to him, "Where are the men which came into thee this night. Bring them out onto us that we may know them."

When they say we may know them, that's the biblical term 'know them' which means we want to have a physical relationship with them. Sort of like when Adam knew his wife Eve and she conceived a son. That word is used throughout the Bible as a euphemism for people committing a physical act to one another. They say, "Bring these men out ..." Here's my question, why aren't they all just at home with their with their homo husband. That's all they wanted, right? They just wanted a monogamous relationship. All they want ... Not even monogamous, because there's no gamous involved. Mono andrus, the bottom line is, why are they not just at home with their queer buddy. Why are they not there with their civil union. Where they are Homo husband?

No, they want strangers and it's all are interested in. All the men from every corner. "Give us strangers, give us these two guys that we may know them" Of course Lot tries to talk them down. I'm not going to read the entire story for sake of time, but look what they respond in verse 9 they said, Stand back and they said again this one fellow came in to sojourn and he'll need to be a judge. Isn't this what they always say when you try to call out these filthy homos, "You're judging, you're so judgemental." What do they say to Lot? "Stop judging us. Don't judge Lot."

Now, will we deal worse with their [heat 00:28:53] they are with them and they pressed sore upon the man even Lot and came near to break the door and of course the angels rescue Lot from that situation. Stop to think about this, the media is telling you they desire a loving relationship. They keep using that word love, I don't think they know what it means. Just like they keep using the word gay and they don't know what it means. They say all these guys desire a loving relationship with just one other person, but the Bible shows that number one, they want to be with strangers, and number two, it's not a loving relationship they desire because when Lot judges them, They say to Lot, "We're going to do worse to you than we we're going to do to them."

Does it sound like they were doing some loving. In order to get worse, you have to start at bad. There's bad and then there's worse. We are going to do bad things to them and we're going to do worse to you. That right there is in complete contradiction to what the world tells us. Now let's test it against reality. Isn't it funny how the gaytheists and fag-nostics of this world claim to be so logical and scientific and they claim to be so rational and they claim to be so interested in facts. This is a pretty scientific sermon because we're actually testing the Bible and the media against facts. Let me change into my lab coat up here. We're performing a science experiment here. The bottom line is, the Bible and what the media are telling you are in direct contradiction on the second point also. It's not a loving, monogamous relationship. It's a disgusting relationship with strangers that they desire.

Let's go to Judges 19 just to really reinforce what the Bible is teaching then we'll go to science and we'll basically test the theory and see whether the media is telling us the truth or whether the Bible is telling us the truth. In Judges 19, we find a similar story. We're going to begin reading, for sake of time we'll just read the basics of this story. You probably know the story but look at verse 22, As they were making their hearts merry, behold the men of the city, certain sons of Belial beset the house round about and beat at the door and spake to the master of the house, the old man saying, "Bring forth the man that came into thine house that we may know him."

Again, a stranger comes to town. He just gets to town, he sits down to eat dinner, and the sons of Belial, what does sons of Belial mean? It simply means the sons of the devil. Belial, Bale, Bail, Beelzabab, that's what we're talking about, satan. These sons of the devil, these satanic, demonic people come to the door and say, "Bring out the man that came in unto you tonight that we may know him." They desire a relationship with that stranger. Not with themselves, not with each other, Nope, they want the stranger. Again the Bible is consistent on that point.

Now let's test it with reality. You say, "Well Pastor Anderson what radical right wing web site are you going to get your information from on this point? What kind of conservative family oriented, Research Council are you getting this stuff from?" Aids.gov. Let me just explain to you what the .gov means, it's the US government. This is the government's own website. Let me ask you something, Is our government for homosexuality or against homosexuality? There's no question about it. In the month of June, our government celebrates for an entire month, a month of sodomy. June is LGBT month. To me LGBT stands for Let God Burn Them, but to them it means lesbian gay bisexual transgender. You say, "We'll, it's LGBTQ." Then you could say, Let God burn Them Quickly or Let God Burn Them Queers.

The bottom line is that the White House, if you even go to WhiteHouse.gov in June, WhiteHouse.gov, they literally shine rainbow lights on the White House at night and they declare a pro sodomy month in June. I even read in a sermon a few years ago where the pronouncement from the desk of Barack Hussein Obama, I hereby declare by the power vested in me by the US Constitution, the month of June to be faggotly months or whatever, and then not only that but there's a special envoy of the US government. We literally have an ambassador who is the homo ambassador to the world. The evangelist of sodomy to the world that is on the step.

Can you really make a case that AIDS.gov is going to be slanted against homo? Does anybody think AIDS.gov is a Christian Web site? Does anybody think that AIDS.gov is run by some fundamental Baptist? Is there any doubt? Please speak now or forever hold your peace. I see a toddler raising his hand but I think he just likes to raise hands. This is from AIDS.gov. This is on their current web site. It's under AIDS 101. You don't have to go real deep on their website, you don't have to navigate through all kinds of pages and where is this thing? It's so funny people are consequently passed around and said, "Where are you getting these statistics because I can't find it?"

If you can't find them, you don't know how to use Google. You don't know how to use the Internet. You probably don't know how to turn on the computer, you probably don't even know what www stands for if you can find this. Because honestly it's under AIDS 101 it's like the most prominent link on AIDS.gov and these statistics that they have are from 2010 and 2013 so this isn't some old archaic statistic as some people accuse it of. No, this is from 2010 and 2013. Here's what it says, I'm reading verbatim. Go fact check me, go check me out, go to AIDS.gov, read up on this. I got to define some terms for you here. Because they use weird terms for things.

MSM, I always thought MSM stood for mainstream media, but actually MSM on AIDS.gov is used over and over again and you have to know what that term means in order to understand what I'm going to read for you. MSM is men who have blank with men. You understand? That's MSM. A lot of the mainstream media, there's probably a cross over there. MSM, MSM. Maybe they'll call that channel MSMBC, based on a lot of people that are probably running it. The bottom line is that when it says MSM, it's saying dudes who want to know other dudes. Men who have blank with men. Men who have intercourse with other men.

Listen to the statistics. Although MSM ... Is it right if I substitute with the word homos. This is straight from AIDS.gov. Although homos represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010 homos accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males. Stop and think about this. I want to help you process this math because maybe you just hear numbers and if you're not a math person, they can just kind of go over your head, so let me just help you analyze the data here. They're claiming that MSM represents 4% of the population of males. That's what the government is saying. I have seen many polls and studies that said it was more like 2% to 3%. 4% is if anything a high estimate, but let's just go with their numbers shall we. Just go with it, the government can't tell us anything that's not true.

Although homos only represent 4% of the population of males, yet in recent years they get 78% of the HIV infections. Before the sermon, I gave my son a math problem because I believe in home schooling. I gave him a little story problem and I handed him this data and I said, "Here son, this says that they represent 4% of the population and they're getting 78% of the AIDS infections this year. Go crunch the numbers and come back and tell me how much more likely a homo is to get AIDS than a straight person." He came back with his calculator and he said, "Dad there are 85 times more likely to get AIDS than a straight person." I checked his work and he's correct.

In fact let me just show you how he's correct because think about it, because I just I just want to make sure you understand the math here. If they're getting 78% of the AIDS infections and normal people are getting 22%, let us just round that off just to get a ballpark and let's say they're getting 80% just to make the numbers easier. Doesn't that mean that there are four times as many homos getting AIDS as straight people. Is everybody following that logic? If they're getting four fifths and the other group is getting one fifth, they're getting four times as many AIDS infections.

What about the fact that they only represent 4% of the population? That means there are 24 times as many straight people. That means they should get 24 times as many infections. 24 X 4 = 96. The reason that he came out with 85 is because it's not 80 it's 78. Do you understand? Because if we take the exact number of 78% and they only represent 4% the population, they are 85 times more likely to get AIDS. Why aren't people being warned, "Hey kids, If you live the homosexual lifestyle, if you're a dude who has intercourse with other dudes, you are 85 times more likely to get AIDS than if you were straight." By the way, there are straight people who live a very promiscuous lifestyle and sleep around, but even with them, even taking that into account, there still 85 times more likely to get AIDS if they're a homo. 85 times more likely, but "Don't smoke kids. It's Red Ribbon Week, don't smoke because you're shaving years off your life." I wonder what AIDS is doing to your body. Your own.

Here's the percentage for lung cancer, what's the percentage for AIDS? 85 times more likely. What if I told you you're 85 times more likely to get a heart attack if you do this activity. Would you say that's a pretty bad activity? What if I said you're 85 times more likely to get cancer? What if I just said you're eight times more likely? Even that you'd be like, "Whoa! I better not mess with that." 85 times more likely. Here's what's so funny is that Christians and atheists alike, Everybody just sits there going, "Duh, I wonder why. Duh. That's kind of weird. Duh" Because here's what, it doesn't take a genius to figure out why.

How do you get AIDS 85 times more often? How do you have a chance of getting AIDS by 85 times, I mean you're 85 times ... Did I mention it's 85 five more likely? It's because they're being we're strangers. Hello, is anybody home? It's funny because when you show all the studies that show that the average homo has been with 500 partners, people say,"Oh, that study is outdated. That study is not accurate. I cannot believe you believe that." How did they get 85 times more AIDS? Just silence, just crickets? "Well, I don't know but I can't be because they had 500 partners."

Here's how you get AIDS, by being with hundreds of strangers and it's not like they get a little more, they get ... Let me put it into a percent for you, because a lot of people don't really understand percentages. How about this, 8,500%. How does that sound for their percent increase in likelihood of getting AIDS. 8,500% that's 85 times more likely. How do you argue with that, I don't even understand. How can you say they're just being with one dude. It's just one woman with one woman. Then how are they contracting AIDS every year at these insane rates according to the government's own website?

The world has no answer, they can just not talk about this smokescreen, try to give the numbers to you and twist them in a way. This is what they'll say, "There's bunch of people in Africa that have AIDS that are straight." But they can't explain these numbers right here in the United States of why a homo is 85 times more likely to get AIDS in 2016 than a straight person. Cannot explain it. They can just try to deflect and try to change the subject and get on other subjects and Africa has got its own problems and that's another story that shall be told another time, but what we're talking about here is what's going on in the USA and it's clear what's going on and how many times do you hear about it? The random encounters in public bathrooms, in airports, in parks and this is what the lifestyles really like. The death style, the bath houses etc

We've got the Bible on one side, we've got what the media says, which one represents reality? It's clear. Case closed. Only someone who just wants to totally stick their head in the sand and ignore that is just going to go, "Well I just still think it's a viable, healthy, normal lifestyle." It's ridiculous, doesn't make any sense, but thirdly this, because every good sermon has three outlines and a poem so let's go to Romans chapter one to get a third point. I don't have a poem tonight. Roses are red violets are blue. God hates homos and so should you. Now I just need a third point to round out this sermon.

Romans chapter one gives us the third aspect where the mainstream media, the MSM, media where they deviate from reality, where the homo agenda has basically entered the twilight zone. Where the rules of science and rules of logic and rationale no longer apply. It's a realm, you're traveling to another dimension that's being governed by feelings of political correctness. There's a signpost up ahead, your next stop is the homo agenda's view of this subject. Here in Romans one we find that there's a difference not only in number one, the fact that the world says they're born that way, the Bible says they got that way by rejecting the Lord. The Bible is what lines up with the fact because the science has proven that they're not born that way.

Number two, the world tells you they desire a loving relationship with one other person or one person at a time, whereas the Bible is telling you they desire random relationships with complete strangers. What did the science show? What do the facts show? What represents reality? Thirdly this, The media portrays these as nice, normal people friendly, kind, loving, upstanding members of society whereas the Bible paints a picture of them as being horribly violent, wicked, predators. We don't have to look at Genesis 19 again, but were they predators in Genesis 19? Were they violent? Were they evil? Yes. What about in Judges 19? The same thing.

Let's look at what Romans one says. the Bible says in verse number 26, for this cause, God gave them up on to vile affections for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men, working that which is unseemly and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meat and even if they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient, being filled ... Is that a new sentence? Somebody help me out, what's the punctuation at the end of verse 28? A semi colon. Is being filled the way that you start a complete sentence? No.

Being filled is a continuation of the people that we were already talking about, where he said, "These people are men with men, women with women, being filled." These people are filled with these other things. Being filled with all unrighteousness. We really could just skip the rest of the list because that pretty much tells us what we need to know. They're filled with all, all unrighteousness, but he goes into detail and he gets specific with us so that we can understand the types of things that these people are filled with. He says, being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, all fornication he's saying, all wickedness.

Covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, spiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful, who knowing the judgment of God that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them to do them.

Here's the thing, people try to twist this passage and say, "This passage says that all those sins are just as bad as being a homo." Is that what that said at all? Anything like that? No, it said that the homos are filled with all these sins in addition to being a homo. They also did all this stuff. The same people are filled with all this other stuff. Look at some of the things on the list; murder, what about this, implacable, unmerciful. That's clear from Genesis 19 iand Judges 19, where there unmerciful. "We're going to do worse to you than we were going to do with them." Of course they actually murdered that lady in Judges 19, she died, and they would have murdered Lot as well if he had not been saved by the two angels that pulled him into the house.

They sought to murder Lot, they successfully murdered the lady in Judges 19, the concubine. They are without natural affection. They are haters of God, they're backbiters, they're full of all wickedness, full of all murder, full of all malignity. The Bible paints a pretty bad picture of these people when they are just these evil predators and these horrible, violent people described in Romans 1, Genesis 19, judges 19 and elsewhere in Scripture if we have the time we could go through all the pertinent scriptures about Sodomites. There are plenty.

Is that what we see represented in the media? No, we see just the sweetest, loving, nicest people. The kindest, most wonderful people. Let's test it with reality. We've got the world's view that there are nice, normal, wonderful, upstanding people and then we have the bible's view that there are these horrible predators. Which one is true? Can they both be true? No. On this third point as well, we must test it with reality. When we test things with reality, there are a couple of ways we could do that. Number one we could look at statistics, we could look at scientific articles, we could we could look at news articles or things like that and try to cut through all the junk and get to the actual data AIDS.gov or whatever, look at the studies and get the data and that tells us something about reality.

Not all, specially when it's coming from people that are pro-homo and even they're admitting how bad it is. If they're going to put a slant on it it would be their slant not my slant. Good night. I wish they'd put my slant on things. That's never going to happen. The other way that we could learn about reality too would be just through our own personal experience. Our personal experience is not the end all, be all, because of the fact that our personal experience is what's known as anecdotal. Have you ever heard that term anecdotal? Anecdotal means that it doesn't really prove that this is a mass trend or a mass phenomenon just because you had one experience, because the exception proves the rule.

For example, someone saying, "I know a homo and they haven't been with 500 people." That's anecdotal. The statistics show that that's what the average homo does. Your anecdote means nothing aside from the fact that, how do that that person hasn't been with a whole bunch of partners. You don't really know what they're doing unless you're with them 24/7 and if we are with homos 24/7, why do you go to this church. The point is that anecdotal data is not conclusive, but anecdotal data is how we learn about the world that we live in. We live our lives and we go through scenarios and situations and we meet all kinds of people and we start forming opinions about the world around us based on interactions that we have.

We can't just completely throw out our personal experience, can we? No. We observe things, we see things and we should be aware of that and say, "Look .." If I've gone soul winning for example and talk to thousands and thousands of people out soul winning, that's going to teach me a lot about people. I'm going to learn a lot about Methodists, because of talk to hundreds and hundreds of Methodists or learn about Presbyterians, Lutherans, Mormons, Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, Muslims. If I meet a Muslim and have a certain experience with that Muslim, I can't say all Muslims are like this based on my anecdotal evidence, but if I talk to a whole bunch of Muslims and keep having the same type of a situation, I can see a pattern and I'm not going to completely just dismiss that as not representing reality.

Does everybody understand what I'm saying? Kind of the difference between anecdotal evidence, personal experience and something that's more of a broader study, statistics, things of that nature. They both have some validity but anecdotal evidence is not conclusive. You can't just say, case closed, because I had these experience. Let me just mention right now my personal experiences. Because I have run into homos throughout my life, I've known people that turned out to be homos as you probably have. I mean if I as for raisin who's ever known somebody either at work or in your family or in school or a friend of yours that turned out to be a homo, put up your hand if you've known somebody. Look around.

We all have a little bit of firsthand anecdotal experience with this subject, don't we? I can tell you this that in recent years, I've heard about people that I knew as a kid who are now openly Sodomites. These were kids that I went to school with. In fact there were two girls that I actually knew very well, that I was actually pretty close with at time, one of them I carpooled with to school every day and drove her. Then another one was just a close friend of mine that was in my inner circle of friends at a time when we were teenagers and now they're both openly lesbians. I just found out about one of them, I believe about two months ago.

When my brother came here to preach, he mentioned it to me. He said, "Hey, you remember so-and-so? She's now a lesbian." Just based on my own anecdotal evidence, I can tell you that I knew these two girls and they did not have those tendencies or proclivities whatsoever when we were teenagers. They were just as interested in dudes as any other girl. They were just completely normal girls in that sense. They did not have these tendencies until way later, till we've been adults for a long time, did it basically come out and they went into this lifestyle later. Especially the one that I just found out about.

Even just right there from my own personal experience, this whole born that way thing, falls apart because I knew these people really well and they were just like everybody else and yet they turned out ... Why? Because of rejecting the Lord. Because of rejecting God's word, because of hating God, because of rejecting Christianity. That's why. That's just a little anecdotal evidence from my own life. Not only that, but I've also known of some Sodmites in my extended family, everybody's got that queer uncle but basically, I've had basically a side of my relatives in my own family and guess what he was? A pedophile. Guess what he molested? Girls. He molested girls and he's an open Sodomite. Open homo. He says he's bi but that means .... It's a Sodomite, folks.

The Bible says of a man to lieth also with mankind as he lieth with woman, both of them have committed abomination, they should surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. This idea of, they only are attracted to one. They go both ways in the Bible, that's another ... That would be a fourth point and that would ruin the perfect harmony of my three point Sermon. I don't want to bring up that point about the world's lie that they're only attracted to the same gender. That's not true. They go both ways Biblically.

This Sodomite uncle was a pedophile. I can take it a step further that I can remember in school, the Sodomite bullies in the school that would basically harass kids and steal their lunch money, beat up kids. Who knows what I'm talking about? Bullies in the school that would beat up but they would make constant Sodomite innuendo. I know I've talked to some other people who've had the same experience where they're growing up in school and I can't even ... I don't want to defile young minds with the kind of stuff that would come out of these people's mouths but they would basically bully and beat up on younger kids and they would make all kinds of Sodomite innuendo and Sodomite things would come out of their mouth that were inexplicable. I believe that they were Sodomites.

I'm not going to defile the minds of the people in here, especially young people with some of the experiences I've seen just growing up and just living my life of a brief thirty four years on this earth that I've lived. The bottom line is, I can tell you honest to God right now, that all of my personal experiences with Sodomites have lined up with what the Bible says. The Sodomites that I have known, the one who is the pedophile in my extended family. He's filled with disease. He's been with all kinds of strangers, he's a predator etc.

I turned in the information on him on to the authorities but they didn't do anything about it. I gave them whatever evidence I had, whatever I knew but, I don't know, I guess they have bigger fish to fry or something, but the bottom line is he ... I didn't know of a single case of him molesting a boy but yet he's a homo. He admits to being a homo and he molested girls. He was a pedophile. All I'm saying, and I know that my anecdotal evidence is not conclusive, but I'm just throwing that out there for what it's worth, that the homos that I have known in my life match up with the Bible's description. If I were to ask people who has had experiences with homos that you've known that matched up with some of the data that we're seeing in the Bible here. Put up your hand if you know where they were with a lot of people or where they are filled with disease and they're basically predators or pedophiles or that they're a violent person, whatever.

That's for what it's worth. Even if we just turn to the data, here's the data. How prevalent is child molestation against homosexuals? The gay report published by homosexual researchers Jay and Young in 1979 revealed that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger, but, listen this, although homos account for less than 2% of the population, they constitute about a third of child molesters. Let's go with AIDS.gov's number and let's say that there are 4% of the population. Let's just say there are 4% of the population. Why do they represent one third of the molesters? Are openly a homo, one third. That doesn't match up. If it matched, it would be 4% of the population, 4% of the molesters, but no, 2 to 4% of the population are a third of the molesters and that's just the ones that are openly a homo, openly a Sodomite. All of these ...

Let me keep reading here. A nationwide investigation of child molestation in the Boy Scouts from 1971 to 1991 revealed that more than 2000 boys reported molestation by adult scout leaders and that was even back when they were not even allowing open homos into the Boy Scouts. They still had 2000 boys being molested by dudes that were scout leaders. How much more now, that the Boy Scouts, aren't they now letting in the homos? This is why no Bible believing Christian should put their kids in the Boy Scouts. I was not even allowed to join the Boy Scouts as a kid you even back when they were not allowing homos. How much more now when they're allowing ...

You want some homo scout leader taking your kid camping? Are you out of your mind? A study of Canadian pedophiles has shown that 30% of those studied admitted to having engaged in homo acts. 91% of the molesters of non familiar boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexuals. 91% said, "I've done nothing but be a homo." In this Canadian study. On and on there are a whole bunch of different facts here but here's what's interesting too, is that pedophiles who molested boys, they actually molested way more boys than the pedophiles who molested girls. This is kind of interesting.

In a 1985 study of the rates of molestation among homo pedo-rats compared to hetero pedophiles, Dr Paul Cameron found the following: 153 pedo-rats had molested 22,981 boys. Wrap your mind around this. They did a study. There were 153 homo pedophiles, 153 and these 153 men, had molested 22,981 boys. Can you even wrap your mind around that? See what I mean about just the constant need for strangers. 224 pedophiles that had molested girls, they molested 4,435 girls over a period of 18 years. That's also a staggering number. I mean that's still ... They're still molesting like 19 or 20 each, or whatever, about one per year over 18 years. About once a year they're molesting, but this number over here, 22 years ... We're talking six a year is the average with these guys over the course of 20 some years, they were molesting six different boys a year.

That right there backs up this idea of them being a predator, a violator who's looking for strangers to be with and I have said this a million times, they're not reproducers they're recruiters and they're after your children. That's what the Bible shows. That's what the evidence shows. The average pedo-rat molested an average of 150 boys. The average homo molester, molested an average of 150. The average hetero pedophile molests an average of 20 girls but honestly just because they're labeled a hetero, I believe that they're also a reprobate as well. Just because they're not openly. It's strange flesh that they're going after when you're going after children. It's obviously just as demented. It's just as sick to go after children as to be with another dude or to be with an animal or anything else that the Bible mentions as being vile or strange flesh and so forth.

Then since we've got the BBC here filming, I even printed out an article from the BBC; Is violence more common in same sex relationships? The answer is yes and this from the BBC's website. More common violence, and they said oh ... This what the BBC said, "Oh, it's because they're under so much stress. It's so stressful being a homo, so then they go home and beat their faggot buddy because they're so stressed out." But they even admitted that there's more violence. How about this, this is the 1972 gay rights platform. This was created at the National Coalition of Gay and again they're using that word wrong. The National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention held in Chicago in 1972. They list off nine goals at the federal level and eight goals at the state level.

You want to know what one of their goals at the state level is, repeal all laws governing the age of consent. Repeal all laws governing the age of consent. Meaning that they would be able to have a relationship with children and it would be legal. They want legal pedophilia right here. I remember being at a friend's house back in the 80s, there was an electronic synth band and I was at a friend's house and he had bought a record, a literal record people. It turned out that the singer of the band was a Sodomite and in the record sleeve it was just all about how ... Just all these articles about how we need to get rid of the age of consent laws and how it's been reduced to 12 over here. In the Netherlands today, the age of consent is 12.

It's 14 I think In other places in Europe. Germany it's 14 or 16, something like that but they keep lowering. In the United States it is 18 but they keep wanting to lower that. That's part of their open agenda and of course a lot of their agenda they've already reached, like repeal all state laws prohibiting cross dressing, done. They've already accomplished that. Then they want to get married and do all this other stuff. It's a list of stuff, I don't really feel like reading their agenda right now, but there's a big list of things and that was one of the things that they wanted to accomplish.

Tonight we've looked at three points and we've looked at reality. We've looked at the Bible and we've looked at the media. Which one of these does not belong? Which one of these is out of sync, which was out of step? It's the media and that's why the title of the sermon is the Homo Agenda versus Reality. They are in opposition one to another. You say, "What's the moral of the story, why preach about it?" First of all I have to preach about it because nobody else preaching about it, practically or they're not preaching it hard enough or they're not preaching it clear enough. When it's marching down the streets of my town, I feel like you need to be covered from my pulpit.

It's my job, it's what God wants me to do. I think that one of the greatest lessons that we can learn from this is how to apply this to our lives because you say, "Pastor Anderson, I want a relevant sermon. I want to apply this to my life." Here's how you apply it to your life, don't let your kids out of your sight because only 150 of these pedophiles will molest about 23,000 boys in a career of molestation and that shows you how often they don't get caught. You say, "Well, we do background checks." Yeah but they go for like 20 years before they get caught, so what good is a background check? There's a first time for everything. Listen to me, the moral of the story is that in 2016 when this movement is spreading like wildfire across the United States, the homos are marching down the streets.

It's being taught in schools, it's being promoted in the media, it's being paraded up and down and they are allowed just free access to children, free access to the Boy Scouts, free access to foster children, free access in the public schools. There is so much molesting going on right now, it boggles the mind and it's going to get worse and worse. Listen to me, in 2016 don't let your kids out of your sight, whether they're male or female. They're both likely to be victimized. The statistics on how many molestation victims there are, both male and female. The statistics are mind boggling, but yet I even see people from this church, who just have complete disregard for watching their children.

I'm telling you, we need a reboot on this thing. Do not drop your kids off with people you don't know and don't even drop them off with people you do know. Unless they're family or something that you can really be sure that ... You know I let watch my kids, my mother. I'm not just letting them be watched by my second cousin twice if we moved, especially when they're really young. Obviously as the boys get, older they get more freedom and everything like that. Some of my kids are teenagers, they're boys and they're not girl teenagers. Obviously girl teenagers are more susceptible, they are a vessel, they need to be protected more.

My boys that are teenagers are to an age where they have more freedom because they can physically defend themselves, somewhat emotionally, mentally, they're capable of knowing what to do in an emergency situation. We're talking toddlers, little kids and you're just saying, "Oh, they're people from church, I'll just leave my kids." Look, these people creep into churches. They creep into the schools and the daycare. Don't let your little children out of your sight. Don't let your daughters out of your sight. Be sure to watch your kids. It's amazing how I can say that and say that and it seems like some people it is like, whoosh.

It's like they just don't apply it to themselves. I'm not trying to tell you what to do. If you say,"You know what Pastor Anderson, I'm just going to let my kids just roam the streets and roam the neighborhoods and I'm just going to drop them off at this family's house for a sleep over and drop me off at this family ... " Honestly, that's none of my business and I'm not going to come to you and say, "Hey, you need to stop that." Because it's none of my business. You do what you want to do. I'm warning you though, that in 2016 if you're smart, you watch your kids all the time. That's the warning that I'm giving you.

Here's the thing, if you walk out of here and disregard that warning and just let your kids be unattended, playing with who knows who, who knows where, totally unattended, then that's on you at that point but at least my conscience is clear. I'm warning you, you can't just let your kids be unattended with strangers or with people that you know very little or even people that you don't know well. If you wouldn't trust that person with a million dollars, why would you trust them with your child which is worth more than a million dollars? I would trust my mother with a million dollars in a heartbeat.

If I had a million dollars, I'd tell my mom, "Here, hold this for me." I would trust her with anything. The point is, people will just go to church and somebody that they just met two weeks ago, they're just leaving their kids with. It's unbelievable. We need to be sober. We need to be vigilant. Because these violent predators are out there by the droves, they're not reproducers, they're recruiters. You say, "Your sermon wasn't loving." You better know it wasn't. If you thought this was a loving sermon, you're crazy, because I don't love pedophiles. So hateful.

It is amazing how all the homos hate Christians but they're not considered a hate group, even though they hate Christianity, even though they hate Jesus, even though they hate the Bible, even though they hate church but then when I turn around and say you're an abomination to me and I'm an abomination to you, it's like, you're hateful. It's a two way street. Everybody that I hate hates me back. Shouldn't that cancel out. You know what the Bible says, Do not I hate them oh lord that hate thee. This idea that it's wrong to ever hate anybody. What's the chapter and verse on that? Somebody help me out. I'm saying the one that says that it's wrong to hate anybody for any reason.

Don't tell me Psalms because it isn't there. You're trying to tell me the chapter verse on Do not I hate them oh lord that hate thee, I got that reference memorized. I don't need to ask for help on that. That's Psalms 130:20-21. I've got that. Thanks for the help though. I'm saying give me a chapter and a verse where we're supposed to never hate anyone for any reason. Never bother that there is a time to love and a time to hate. You say, yeah, but in 2016 ... I don't give a limp. I'm going to keep preaching the same way as I preach a decade ago, I was preaching this a decade ago, I was preaching it two decades ago on the playground and I'm going to keep on preaching it.

The bottom line is, that the Bible doesn't change and I'm not going to change. I don't need somebody to tell me, "Oh, you're a hate group." Declare me a love group leader or a hate group leader or declare me a Boy Scout leader, I don't care what the world declares me I'm going to keep preaching the Bible and they can call me whatever they want. They called Jesus, Beelzebub. They can call me names and sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me. Who cares. "What did you feel when the SPLC labeled you as a hate group? How did you feel?" I felt great. Who cares. "But didn't that make you rethink?" The only thing that made me rethink was, "Have I preached hard enough?" The only thing I question about this whole Southern Poverty Law Center thing is why didn't they send me a plaque or something that I could display in the foyer and I'm thinking about making my own.

You know howyou walk into a business they have like a Better Business Bureau. Better Business Bureau approve whatever. I want to do like, "Hey, we've been certified that we hate homos. If you're looking for a church that hates homos, were certified. It's official." I may have have brother Baker get on that right away. Can you give me a plaque that I can put up in the foyer? Why? Because we are not ashamed of the truth and you know what? If people are like, "Yeah, but people don't understand that the Bible says that." That's their fault for not reading the Bible. I can't be responsible for people's ignorance of the Bible. Thank God for a church full of people that want to hear what the Bibles preach. Who's you're here tonight? There we go. See, not everybody's bowed by the need to bail.

Let's bow our heads for a word of prayer. Father, we thank you so much for your word, Lord. Lord, thank you for the warning so that we're not just sitting ducks allowing ourselves and our children to be victimized by these violent predators Lord. Please help us to not be brainwashed by the media Lord, help us to get a reality check from your word because Lord, far more important than what any statistics say or any science studies say far more important than what any anecdotal evidence can show us, is what the Bible shows us Lord. Honestly Lord, you know my heart, you know that I didn't even need the anecdotal or scientific evidence Lord because I already just believe the Bible about it. Lord I pray that the reality check tonight would help some people who maybe were confused on this issue or on the fence about it to actually understand that your word was right. We already knew that it was right by faith Lord, but help the doubtful Lord to understand the truth of your word tonight. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen.